This is a page from our historical archives - for more from the Missouri Bicycle & Pedestrian Federation please visit our new web page
MBF logo Missouri Bicycle Federation

Advocacy Alerts Archives

Bicycle-related projects, legislation, funding requests, that would benefit from your action in contacting public officials, media, and other cyclists.
MBF Home Page > Advocacy Alerts > Archives
Please send suggestions for advocacy alerts to webmaster [at] mobikefed.org
Click here to receive Advocacy Alerts by email
RSS XML Newsfeed
MoBikeFed's Current Action Campaigns
Take direct action in support of these issues in as little as two minutes:
Track current legislation

Advocacy:
Missouri Complete Streets Petition: We want 5000 signatures on a Complete Streets Petition in time for the 2010 Missouri legislative session.
Advocacy:
Bike/Ped in MoDOT funding?: a group is working on a new funding initiative for MoDOT. Should this include requirements and incentives for MoDOT to design for bicycling and walking?
Advocacy:
Bicycling License Plate: Many other states have 'Share the Road with Bicycles' license plates. Why not Missouri, too? In 1 minute you can show your support.

21 July 2003: Transportation Enhancements action in the U.S. House July 24th
posted by Brent Hugh at 7/21/2003 08:29:00 PM
We have previously reported that A subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives has voted to eliminate the funding for Enhancements in the federal transportation bill.

Enhancements funds most bicycle and pedestrian projects across the U.S.
UPDATE 24 July 2003: The vote to restore Enhancements funding narrowly failed in the House Appropriations Committee. Read the details on MoBikeFed News. Between now and Auigust 2003, your Representative and Senators need to hear from you about your support for bicycle and pedestrian funding in the reauthorization of the federal transportation bill.
The chair of the House Appropriations Committee is poised to introduce a substitute bill that will re-instate Enhancements.

Appropriations Committee action on the bill is scheduled for Thursday, July 24th, 2003.

The current debate is a great opportunity to write your Representative and state your support for funding for bicycle, pedestrian, and other intermodal projects.

Click here to see a summary of Enhancements projects in Missouri.

Click here to find contact information for Missouri elected officials.

Salon has an article about the proposed cuts.

Below is the latest update on the situation from Rails-to-Trails:

TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS UPDATE #4
As you know, the bill approved by the Transportation, Treasury and Independent Agencies Subcommittee of House Appropriations on July 11 would eliminate all funding for Transportation Enhancements activities. The grassroots outcry against this indefensible action is being heard loud and clear in the halls of Congress!

In response to the public opposition to the subcommittee bill, the Chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, Rep. C.W. Bill Young (R-FL), has indicated that he intends to offer a "substitute package" when the bill comes before the full committee. Chairman Young's intentions were revealed in an editorial and a press story that appeared in newspapers in his local district over the weekend:

http://www.sptimes.com/2003/07/20/Perspective/Reinstate_trail_fundi.shtml

http://tampatrib.com/floridametronews/MGAASO34BID.html

Today RTC President Keith Laughlin sent a letter to Chairman Young commending him for his leadership in taking the unusual step of preparing an alternative to this fatally-flawed subcommittee bill. Laughlin also offered RTC's assistance in developing an alternative that restores full funding for Transportation Enhancements in the fiscal year 2004 appropriation for the US Department of Transportation.

We've got momentum on our side but this is no time to rest on our laurels! Chairman Young's substitute bill could still come before the full House Appropriations Committee this week. A list of the members of the committee can be found here:

http://www.house.gov/appropriations/members.htm

If your Representative sits on the Appropriations Committee, please call them and ask them to contact Chairman Young in order to ensure that his 'substitute package' restores full funding for Transportation Enhancements in fiscal year 2004.

In the meantime, press coverage has been proliferating, and RTC will continue to work with the news media to get the word out about how important the Transportation Enhancements program is for communities across the country. Here are two more great pieces that appeared over the weekend:

http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/200/metro/Cut_could_spell_end_to_rail_trail_projects+.shtml

http://www.pjstar.com/news/editorials/g16437a.html

Our strategy is working. Again, please continue to provide feedback to RTC's Manager of Trails Advocacy, Ken Rosenfeld, at rtckenr@transact.org.

Thank you for your continued efforts.
Comments: No comments on this article yet - what's your opinion on this article or topic?

16 July 2003: Federal funding for bicycling in danger for 2004; vote scheduled for July 21st
posted by Brent Hugh at 7/16/2003 05:58:00 PM
A subcommittee of the U.S. House of Representatives has voted to eliminate the funding for Enhancements in the federal transportation bill.

Enhancements funds most bicycle and pedestrian projects across the U.S.

The Internation Mountain Biking Association has a good summary of the issue and what you can do about it.

This is a great opportunity to (again) let your elected representatives know that you support bicycling.

Here is a summary of the issue from BikeLeague News:
The House Transportation Appropriations subcommittee recently cut federal funding for a majority of bicycle projects for FY 2004 by prohibiting funds from being used for transportation enhancements. They have also severely cut or eliminated funding for a number of other bicycling sources, such as the Transportation and Community Preservation Pilot Program (TCSP).

The full Appropriations Committee is expected to vote on this measure as early as Monday, July 21. The League is requesting all bicyclists contact their Members of Congress and urge them to restore funding for bicycling in the Transportation Appropriations Bill for FY 2004. Regardless of whether your member is on the Appropriations Committee or not, it is imperative that ALL Members of Congress realize how important enhancements and TCSP funding is to bicyclists. Not only do we need funding restored for FY 2004, but your message should also serve as a future reminder to Congress that these programs must be preserved and strengthened in TEA-21 reauthorization.

To contact Congress, please visit the League's new Advocacy Center. You can determine who your Senators and Members ofCongress are and send them a message on this issue as well as other issues
of importance to bicycling.
Please do take the time to contact U.S. Senators and Representatives from Missouri about this issue. In a tight budget year, funding for bicycle and pedestrians projects will be under constant pressure. Our elected representatives need to know that their constituents support bicycle and pedestrian projects and funding.

At a time when inactivity, obesity, and related problems are rising at such a rate that they have been labelled an "epidemic", and 10% of roadway fatalities are pedestrians and cyclists, while less than 1% of funding is directed towards projects that would improve bicycle and pedestrian safety and connectivity, it is good public policy to support continued funding for bicycle and pedestrian projects.

Funding for such projects should be maintained and increased, not slashed.

Your representatives need to hear you say that.

Especially important for this issue is Representative Jo Ann Emerson, from Missouri's 8th District (the southeast corner of the state, including Farmington, Rolla, and Cape Girardeau), who sits on the House Appropriations Committee. If you know cyclists who live in the 8th District, please have them contact Rep. Emerson's office.

Click here for a list of Missouri Enhancement projects (totalling $115 million of federal funds) and District 8's Enhancement projects (totalling 8.1 million federal funds).
Comments: 1 comment on this article
Brent wrote: 07/16/03 07:42pm • 12.134.11.160
Summary of Enhancements projects in Missouri
--------------------------------------------
Future projects like this will not be funded if the proposed cuts go through:

Total Missouri Enhancement Funds, 1992-2002: $115,428,485
Total Missouri Enhancement projects, 1992-2002: 474

Missouri Project Highlights:

Katy Trail--including many phases and associated projects
Carter Creek Bike/Ped Trail, Rolla
St. Louis County Sidewalk Program
Trolley Track Trail (Kansas City)
Riverfront trails in Hannibal, Cape Girardeau, St. Joseph,
St. Louis, and Kansas City areas
Indian Creek Trail (Kansas City area)
Award-winning urban parkway/trail system in St. Joseph
Ozark Greenways Trail System
Many other greenway projects around the state
Many other sidewalk projects around the state


Summary of Enhancements projects in District 8
----------------------------------------------
Future projects like these will not be funded if the proposed elimination of Enhancements funding goes forward.

The following lists most District 8 Enhancements projects, but is not exhaustive.

Total federal funds from all District 8 projects listed below: $8.1 million
Total number of District 8 projects listed below: 44

Cape Girardeau (total federal funds, $2.3 million)

Lexington Trace of Cape LaCroix Trail
Lexington Trace of Cape LaCroix Trail - Phase II
Ped/Bike/Landscaping/Scenic Beautification
Mississippi River Walk Riverfront
Mississippi River Walk Phase II
Cape Girardeau Trailway System (5 mi)
Red House Interpretive Center
Bill Emerson Memorial Bridge (Aesthetic Lighting)


Rolla (total federal funds, $1,116,000):

TEA-21 Walking/Biking Path - Phase III
TEA-21 Sidewalk Improvements - Phase I
Walking/Bikepath Phase 4
Walking/Bikepath Phase 5
Path Along UM-Rolla Athletic Field (1.78 mi)
Carter Creek Bike & Ped Trail - Phase II
City of Rolla - Engine 1501


Park Hills (total federal funds, $475,000)

Park Hills Greenway
Parkland Bike Way


Other projects:

St. Francois County Jail and Bikeway, Farmington, $281,789
St. James/Maramec Iron works Bike Path, St. James, $249,152
Hargrove Bridge Rehabilitation, Butler $199,440
Pedestrian Sidewalk in Fisk, Fisk, Butler, $84,551
Highway 60/67 Interchange Landscaping, Poplar Bluff, Butler, $61,600
Pedestrian Pkwy on Rte D Btwn Middle School & Park, Jackson,Cape Girardeau, $220,000
Jefferson Street Pedestrian Bridge, Jackson, Cape Girardeau, $43,308
Van Buren Bridge Pedestrian Walkway, Carter, $640,000
Dunklin County Welcome Center, Dunklin, $50,000
Rte 63 and North Bus. 63 Interchange Enhancement, Howell, $128,000
Rte 60 & Rte 63 Interchange Landscaping, Howell, $250,000
Landscaping Intersections, Iron, $38,606
Fredericktown Bikeway & Historic Hwy - Phase I, Fredericktown, Madison, $252,256
Fredericktown Bikeway/Historic Hwy - Phase II, Fredericktown, Madison, $185,879
Marquand Museum and Trail, Marquand, Madison,$205,598
Pedestrian Walkways, Portageville, New Madrid, $75,129
Dorena Ferry Landing/Mississippi River Trail, Dorena, Mississippi, $62,000
Railroad Museum & Tourist Information Center, Thayer, Oregon, $45,206
Entrance Landscaping, Pemiscot, $26,714
Sikeston Bus. & Tech. Park Treescape Project, Sikeston, Scott, $8,151
Railroad Depot, Sikeston, Scott, $50,574
Clearwater Lake Ped/Bike Trail MO, Wayne, $147,851
Sam A. Baker Park Bicycle/Ped Trail, Wayne, $191,050
McKenzie Creek Bridge, Piedmont, Wayne, $81,627
Highway 65 - Bee Creek Interchange, Branson, Taney, $124,018
Acquisition and Landscaping of Railroad R/W, 2001, Branson, Taney, $523,840
(Only part of Taney Cty is in the 8th District; I'm not certain if these projects are within the boundary or not, regardless, they certainly benefit all residents of Taney County)

Web link: http://staff.mwsc.edu/~bhugh

7 July 2003: Support Safe Routes to School in the next federal transportation bill
posted by Brent Hugh at 7/07/2003 09:22:00 AM
Martha Roskowski of America Bikes writes:
SUPPORT THE OBERSTAR PACE BILL
Ask your Representative to be a co-sponsor

On June 18th, Congressman Oberstar (D-Minn) announced the introduction of a bill to create a strong national Safe Routes to School program. It's a great bill, but we need the bicycle COMMUNITY to speak up.

Please write a letter or make a call to your Representative today asking him or her to become a co-sponsor of Oberstar's bill, the Pedestrian and Cyclist Equity Act of 2003 (PACE). LINKS TO A sample letter and talking points are below.

PACE would send $250 million per year to states to create safer streets around schools and encourage bicycling and walking. Other elements of PACE provide grants to increase physical activity and build three model communities. PACE will likely be folded into the reauthorization of TEA-21.

The bill faces a long road through Congress. First, we must convince the US House of Representatives to support PACE. Representatives show their support by signing on as a "co-sponsor" of the bill. A similar bill will likely be introduced in the US Senate soon, but right now, we're just targeting the US House of Representatives.

Your voice is important, as Representatives listen closely to business people from their districts. Please send your letter or make the call by July 11th.

Find your Representative and the address at http://www.americabikes.org/reachrep.asp. For more
information about PACE including a list of current co-sponsors, visit http://www.americabikes.org/saferoutes.asp
Comments: No comments on this article yet - what's your opinion on this article or topic?

3 July 2003: Support railtrails
posted by Brent Hugh at 7/03/2003 11:30:00 AM
A little-known section of the Bush Administration's "SAFETEA" proposal could have a devastating effect on the Rails-to-Trails movement if it is incorporated into the final TEA-21 reauthorization currently working its way through Congress.

The House and the Senate are currently working on their own versions of the TEA-21 reauthorization, which are independent of the administration's SAFETEA proposal. Nevertheless, with the administration, the House, and the Senate all controlled by one party, there is always the possibility that the adminstration's proposal will influence the House and the Senate versions of TEA-21 reauthorization.

With work on the TEA-21 reauthorization bill currently in progress in both the Senate and House of Representatives, now would be a good time to contact your Senators and Representative to express your support for bicycle and pedestrian issues in general, and Rails-to-Trails in particular.

Please note that an inaccurate email message has been circulating about the anti-railtrail section of SAFETEA. The email claims that Missouri Senator Kit Bond has introduced an amendment with the anti-railtrail language. This is not true; Senator Bond has not introduced any amendments related to the TEA-21 reauthorization. MoBikeFed News has more details about the inaccurate email message.

Information about the railtrail-unfriendly section of the Bush administration's SAFETEA proposal:
Background Information
Railbanking, Rail-Trails and Section 1716 of SAFETEA
Provided by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, July 1, 2003

There are nearly 12,500 miles of open rail-trail in the United States. Another 16,760 miles are in development, with communities in every state awaiting their construction. The enormous popularity of trails is fueled by their ability to generate civic pride and economic prosperity by catalyzing small business growth, promoting tourism and increasing property values. Rail-trails enhance livability by improving air and water quality, and preserving natural, cultural and historical resources. They also create healthy people and communities by making it easy and fun to get outside for exercise, transportation and recreation.

The driving policy force behind this huge movement is two pieces of federal legislation: 1) the 1983 railbanking provisions of the National Trails Systems Act allowing unused railroad corridors to be preserved for possible rail reactivation if managed on an interim basis as trails and 2) the Transportation Enhancements (TE) program included in federal transportation legislation since 1991 which has provided more than $530 million for rail-trail acquisition and development. Specifically, 4,334 miles of rail corridor have been railbanked; 1,611 miles of railbanked corridor are open to the public (85 trails); and over $115 million in Transportation Enhancements dollars have been devoted to railbanked rail-trails.

On Sept. 30, 2003, current federal surface transportation legislation, TEA-21 expires. It is currently undergoing congressional renewal or “reauthorization.”

The Bush Administration’s proposed transportation bill, introduced in both the House and the Senate as part of the Safe and Flexible Transportation Equity Act, “SAFETEA,” includes a provision, Section 1617, captioned indemnification on Certain Railbanked Projects. This provision was included in the transportation bill at the request of the U. S. Department of Justice. Its purpose is to stop states from using TE or any other federal dollars for railbanked trails. It does so by requiring them to reimburse the federal government for any such investment, plus attorneys’ fees, if such a corridor is the subject of a winning takings claim. Its affect would be to stop railbanking in its tracks.

Rails-to-Trails Conservancy strongly opposes Section 1617 of SAFETEA. This provision would render railbanking useless as a tool for corridor preservation and interim trail use.
For additional information about the legislation, including the actual text proposed, an analysis of it, and a state-by-state list of affected trails, please click on the "comment on this article" link at the end of this message.
Comments: 5 comments on this article
Brent wrote: 07/03/03 12:37pm • 12.134.11.160
The text of the letter I faxed to Senator Bond:

The Honorable Kit Bond
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

RE: Please support rails-to-trails, withdraw proposed amendment to Sec. 1617

Dear Senator,

You may know that the Katy Trail is one of Missouri's best-known tourist attractions. I recently rode the trail and there is no doubt that it is a gem—unique in Missouri.

I am sure you know that many nearby residents have opposed such trails in the planning and construction phases. But Sunday's St. Joseph News-Press reported:

Although the creation of this trail along the defunct Missouri- Kansas-Texas railroad line was a political hot potato and vehemently protested by many landowners, most now believe the creation of the Katy Trail was a good thing.

The author goes on to give several examples of economic revitalization in towns along the trail.

The Katy Trail is but one rails-to-trails success story of hundreds around the nation.

You may also know that obesity and lack of exercise is such a serious problem among the U.S. population that the Centers for Disease Control have become labeling it an "obesity epidemic". The economic consequences of this epidemic will be huge. Missouri is bearing the brunt of this epidemic: our childhood obesity rate is nearly twice the national average (and the national average is nearly twice what it should be).

In many built-up urban areas, a rail-to-trail conversion is the only possible way hiking, jogging, and bicycling trails of any extent can be created.

Such trails make an entire area more livable and economically viable. Employers and employees look for such amenities when moving to an area. One reason Missouri is in such an economic mess is that other areas of the country have better taken advantage of the opportunity to create such trails within their urban areas, while urban areas in Missouri have been missing the boat.

In addition, railbanking is of vital national importance. The rail lines were assembled at tremendous effort and expense several generations ago. When these right-of-ways are dismantled, it will become impossible to ever re-assemble them.

It is impossible to predict the future value that will be destroyed when the rail right-of-ways are dismantled. The cost of maintaining these right-of-ways is relatively low, and their potential future value—possibly for uses we cannot even envision now—incredibly high.

--Dr. Brent Hugh
--Jan Hugh
Raytown, Missouri

Web link: http://staff.mwsc.edu/~bhugh
Brent wrote: 07/03/03 08:08pm • 12.134.11.160
Messages for Use in Opposing Section 1617 of SAFETEA
Prepared by Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, July 1, 2003

· Federal law establishes clear policy favoring the preservation of inactive rail corridors by providing for their use on an interim basis as trails [16 U.S.C. Sec.1247(d), the “Railbanking Law]. ISTEA, TEA-21, and now SAFETEA support(ed) this policy by specifically identifying the preservation of railway corridors as trails as an activity eligible for Transportation Enhancements funding. Section 1617 contradicts and undermines existing federal law and policy.

· The Administration’s analysis of Section 1617 maintains that if TE or other federal dollars are used for a rail-trail and a subsequent payment is made from the U.S. Judgment Fund to underwrite a successful takings claim that the “…United States can be said to pay twice for the same trail corridor….” This reasoning is flawed and reveals an extraordinary lack of understanding of rail property transactions. Indeed, in such cases, TE funds used for acquisition purchase the railroad’s interest in the corridor. Court ordered settlements accommodate adjacent property owner interests. The acquisition simply occurs sequentially rather than all at once. TE investment in trail development is unrelated to purchase and any requirement to return those funds to the federal treasury is federal heisting of state assets.

· Section 1617will not only halt the acquisition of corridors slated for future abandonment by drying up purchasing dollars, it will also stop rail-trails that are already railbanked and under development. Most trails, particularly long ones, are built segment by segment over an extended period of time as funds become available. 1617 forecloses the completion of such corridors as Nebraska’s Cowboy Trail or Colorado’s Rio Grande Trail from Basalt to Glenwood Springs.

· 934 miles of rail-trail currently undergoing railbanking negotiations will probably be lost if 1617 passes along with 2,723 miles of corridor railbanked but still in the project stage. This 3,657 miles of potential rail-trail is equivalent to losing a transportation corridor stretching from Miami to Seattle, with 300 miles to spare -- a tragedy for a nation whose people are caught in an obesity epidemic and its attendant health problems.

Web link: http://staff.mwsc.edu/~bhugh
Brent wrote: 07/03/03 08:09pm • 12.134.11.160
SAFETEA
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2003

SEC. 1617 INDEMNIFICATION ON CERTAIN RAILBANKED PROJECTS.

Where, pursuant to a final judgment, a Federal court finds the United States liable by operation of section 8(d) the National Trails System Act (enacted by section 208 of Pub. L. 98-11, 97 Stat. 48) (16 U.S.C. 1247(d)), for a taking of property under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, a State that has received funds, after the date of enactment of this Act, under a Federal-aid highway program established under title 23, United States Code, and that has used a portion of those funds to acquire, develop, maintain or improve a railroad right-of-way that is the subject of the judgment, shall indemnify the United States up to the lesser amount of the judgment awarded (including attorney fees) or the Federal-aid highway program funds received in connection with that railroad right-of-way.

Administration’s Analysis

Under a variety of programs (e.g., the Recreational Trails Program, the Transportation Enhancements Program, the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, Surface Transportation Program), the Department of Transportation provides funds to States to acquire, develop, construct, and maintain trails. States may use these funds to make grants to local governments and private organizations (“project sponsors”) for trail projects. Such projects include trails established pursuant to the National Trails System Act Amendments of 1983, 16 U.S.C. 1247(d) (“Rails to Trails Act”), located on a railroad right-of-way.

Where the railroad or project sponsor’s ownership interest in the right-of-way would not allow the railbanking and interim trail use under applicable State law but for the operation of the Rails-to-Trails Act, the United States has been held liable by the Federal courts under the Fifth Amendment to pay just compensation. The result in these instances is that the United States can be said to pay twice for the same trail corridor – first through funds provided by DOT, and then a second time as the result of a just compensation award to property owners who abut the trail corridor and who are found by the court to hold the underlying fee interest.

This section adds an indemnification requirement for States involved in railbanking. If a Federal court determines that property owners are entitled to just compensation in a corridor where Federal-aid highway funds have been used after the date of enactment to acquire right-of-way interests or develop a trail that is located on a railroad right-of-way under the Rails to Trails Act, then the State would have to pay the United States the lesser amount of the judgment awarded (including attorneys’ fees) or the Federal-aid highway program money received in connection with that railroad right-of-way.

Web link: http://staff.mwsc.edu/~bhugh
Brent wrote: 07/03/03 08:10pm • 12.134.11.160
Once and Future Rail-Trails

(Targeted state listing of rail-trails that we would not have if Section 1617 had been the law when they were railbanked and sister trails at risk if 1617 passes)


Florida

Development in Danger:
- Leesburg Branch corridor - in and around Leesburg; 5.85 miles currently under railbanking negotiations
- Sarasota to Venice corridor

Idaho

Open:
- Trail of the Coeur d’Alenes (Wallace Branch) – is a 79.1-mile trail; received $1,946,000 of TE funding

Development in Danger:
- Hillcrest to Orchard corridor (Boise Cutoff) – 18.2-mile corridor abandoned in ’00
- Grangeville to Spalding corridor – 66.8-mile corridor railbanked in ’01

Missouri

Open:
- Katy Trail – 238.1 railbanked miles; 221.5 open; received $29,803,064 in TE funding

Development in Danger:
- Rock Island Corridor – potential connection between the Katy Trail and Kansas City

New York

Development in Danger:
- The High Line Trail – currently under railbanking negotiations

Ohio

Open:
- Richland B&O Trail (Butler to Mansfield) – 18-mile corridor; received $199,125 of TE funding

Development in Danger:
- Massillion Branch (Massillon to Run Junction) – 5.65-mile corridor railbanked in ’99
- Frederickstown to Mt. Vernon corridor


Vermont

Open:
- Missisquoi Valley Rail-Trail – 26.6-mile corridor; received $470,339 in TE funding
- Burlington Waterfront Bikeway – 7.6-mile corridor; received $167,500 in TE funding

Virginia

Open:
- Hanging Rock Battlefield Trail – 1.58-mile corridor; received $3,266,187 in TE funding

Development in Danger:
- Arno Junction to Derby corridor – 3.03-mile corridor currently under railbanking negotiations

Web link: http://staff.mwsc.edu/~bhugh
Brent wrote: 07/03/03 08:10pm • 12.134.11.160
Background Information
Railbanking, Rail-Trails and Section 1716 of SAFETEA
Provided by the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy, July 1, 2003

There are nearly 12,500 miles of open rail-trail in the United States. Another 16,760 miles are in development, with communities in every state awaiting their construction. The enormous popularity of trails is fueled by their ability to generate civic pride and economic prosperity by catalyzing small business growth, promoting tourism and increasing property values. Rail-trails enhance livability by improving air and water quality, and preserving natural, cultural and historical resources. They also create healthy people and communities by making it easy and fun to get outside for exercise, transportation and recreation.
The driving policy force behind this huge movement is two pieces of federal legislation: 1) the 1983 railbanking provisions of the National Trails Systems Act allowing unused railroad corridors to be preserved for possible rail reactivation if managed on an interim basis as trails and 2) the Transportation Enhancements (TE) program included in federal transportation legislation since 1991 which has provided more than $530 million for rail-trail acquisition and development. Specifically, 4,334 miles of rail corridor have been railbanked; 1,611 miles of railbanked corridor are open to the public (85 trails); and over $115 million in Transportation Enhancements dollars have been devoted to railbanked rail-trails.
On Sept. 30, 2003, current federal surface transportation legislation, TEA-21 expires. It is currently undergoing congressional renewal or “reauthorization.”
The Bush Administration’s proposed transportation bill, introduced in both the House and the Senate as part of the Safe and Flexible Transportation Equity Act, “SAFETEA,” includes a provision, Section 1617, captioned indemnification on Certain Railbanked Projects. This provision was included in the transportation bill at the request of the U. S. Department of Justice. Its purpose is to stop states from using TE or any other federal dollars for railbanked trails. It does so by requiring them to reimburse the federal government for any such investment, plus attorneys’ fees, if such a corridor is the subject of a winning takings claim. Its affect would be to stop railbanking in its tracks.
Rails-to-Trails Conservancy strongly opposes Section 1617 of SAFETEA. This provision would render railbanking useless as a tool for corridor preservation and interim trail use.

Web link: http://staff.mwsc.edu/~bhugh


Missouri Events Calendar

On this page...

Related resources

MoBikeFed's Missouri Advocacy Resources

St. Louis Bike Fed's Advocacy Resources

League of American Bicyclists News & Advocacy Info

LAB Action Alerts

National Center for Bicycling & Walking (BikeFed)

Bicycling Life's Guide to Effective Advocacy

Bikes Belong Guide to Effective Advocacy

How to Encourage Bicycling

John S. Allen's suggestions for metro St. Louis bicycling transportation (many tips & ideas for all Missouri cities)

Find contact info for any federal, state, local elected official