Missouri Bicycle News :: Councilman wants to suspend Columbia bicycle harassment ordinance <script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.blogger.com/static/v1/common/js/327583163-csitaillib.js"></script> <script>if (typeof(window.attachCsiOnload) != 'undefined' && window.attachCsiOnload != null) { window.attachCsiOnload('ext_blogspot'); }</script>

The Columbia Missourian reports:

Fourth Ward Councilman Jerry Wade said Monday he thinks the City Council "made a mistake" with its approval last month of an ordinance protecting cyclists from harassment.

Wade started off the council comments portion of Monday night's meeting with a reversal from his stance in June. At the June 15 meeting, the council unanimously approved the cyclists ordinance. . . .

Wade prepared a two-sided handout detailing his present opposition to the ordinance. He said the council should vote to suspend the ordinance for at least six months while staff evaluates whether or not amendments to current city ordinances can provide broader harassment protection.

KOMU-TV adds:

Wade now argues the measure is one sided in that in only helped cyclists, not drivers. He also said the ordinance singles out bikers from harassment and its not the council's responsibility to single out groups.

No one is suggesting that if the measure could be improved, it shouldn't be. In fact at the initial council meeting, council members suggested that the measure be expanded to include pedestrians and wheelchair users, and all supporters (including the Missouri Bicycle & Pedestrian Federation) agree is a good idea.

But simply suspending the ordinance seems to be caving in to the belligerent and un-informed faction that really just wants bicyclists and pedestrians off the road and out of their way.

If you live in Columbia, contacting your city council member about this issue is very important right now. Council contact info is here.

Suggested message:

I absolutely oppose suspending the bicyclist harassment ordinance.

The vocal and nasty opposition the ordinance has received from a few residents only shows how much the ordinance is really needed.

The ordinance opens the way for the city and the police to work to make our streets safer and more welcoming to all groups.

I would certainly support work to make the harassment ordinance more inclusive of all groups, including pedestrians, wheelchair users, and even drivers who are harassed, intimidated, or threatened. But we absolutely should not suspend the ordinance, because it is needed right now.

Comments: 2 comments on this article

Angela wrote:

07/07/09 03:00pm • 128.206.108.31

Maybe he voted for it so that it could pass unanimously and we could boast that we were the first city in Missouri to have this ordinance, then backpedaled so he doesn't have to suffer living in a city that actually has that ordinance.

This really makes me mad: "Thornhill related a recent experience in which he had to lock his brakes at a four-way intersection where he had the right-of-way to avoid hitting a bicyclist breaking the law.
"I've seen a couple bicyclists testing the boundaries," he said."

I wonder how many motorists he's seen "testing the boundaries" or who nearly caused a collision, in just one day.

And what the heck does that have to do with this ordinance? Do cyclists who fail to observe a stop sign deserve to be harassed? Would he think a motorist who runs a stop sign should be yelled at, honked at, and driven off the road?

Ted B wrote:

08/05/09 12:27pm • 69.23.121.148

My son and used to go on weekly rides till one day on a residential street a group of teens decided it would be fun to drive by throwing beer bottles out the window at us. We called the cops but they never showed. Its easy to blame a bicyclist but stats show that even with motorcycles 9 out of 10 accidents are the fault of the Motor Vehicle driver not the cyclist. I don't know what the stats are for bicycles but I do know that the constant harrassment by passing motorists who think the road is theirs and thiers only has convinced me to hang up my bike. Its getting dangerous out there and our law makers are doing nothing.

Related:: News: THE VOTE: Amendment 3 debate heats up; News: California dedicates 1/3 of safety money to Safe Routes to Schools; News: MoBikeFed Editorial: Amendment 3 will affect Missouri's transportation future; News: Columbia bicyclist harassment ordinance brings out the bicycle haters; News: Your advocacy matters: Columbia bicycle harassment law re-affirmed

Missouri Bicycle News Article

Recent Posts in Missouri Bicycle News

Archives of Missouri Bicycle News

Missouri Events Calendar

On this page...

Related resources