Research shows better facilities promote more bicycling and walking
Submitted by Brent Hugh on Tue, 09/01/2009 - 7:28pm
We've been putting together some research for a grant application and the results are very interesting.
The question is, do more, better bicycling and walking facilities actually increase the amount of bicycling and walking?
The answer is a resounding yes.
Below is a summary of some of the research and, below that, full citations of the original sources.
The question is, do more, better bicycling and walking facilities actually increase the amount of bicycling and walking?
The answer is a resounding yes.
Below is a summary of some of the research and, below that, full citations of the original sources.
Some of the summaries are based on the invaluable Travel Demand Management Encyclopedia and others to a very comprehensive report, Guidelines for Analysis of Investments in Bicycle Facilities, both of which have summaries and references to many other reports on these and related subjects.
BETTER BICYCLE FACILITIES PROMOTE MORE BICYCLING
BETTER WALKING FACILITIES PROMOTE MORE WALKING
Sources:
BETTER BICYCLE FACILITIES PROMOTE MORE BICYCLING
- Hopkinson and Wardman (1996) found that individuals were willing to pay a premium to use bicycle facilities that are deemed safer argue that increasing safety is likely more important than reducing travel time to encourage bicycling.
- The study "Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities" found a strong positive correlation between the number of miles of bicycle lanes and paths per square mile and the mode share of bicycle commuters (Dill & Carr, 2003).
- The study "If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them" found a positive association between miles of bicycle pathways per 100,000 residents and the percentage of commuters using bicycles, and states, "One problem with shifting the mode of commuting away from automobiles may simply be an inadequate supply of bicycle facilities" (Nelson & Allen, 1997)
. - A study of the Minneapolis-St. Paul region found that adding or improving bicycle facilities brought a significant increase in bicycling, even in areas that previously had high levels of bicycling. The areas near the improved facilities showed mode share increasing from 1.7% to 2.0%, while the remainder of the region remained constant. The report says, "Downtown Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota, where most of the facilities were concentrated, showed large increases in bicycle mode share, while downtown St. Paul, which had few improvements, had no increase" (Barnes, et al, 2005).
- Bicycle routes and directional signage is important for creating a complete bicycle network network and connecting important destinations. To encourage cycling as an alternative commuting mode, Nelson & Allen emphasize that facilities must connect appropriate origins and destinations.
BETTER WALKING FACILITIES PROMOTE MORE WALKING
- Loukopoulos and Gärling (2005) find that there is an threshold distance, above which people (on average) will choose to drive rather than walk to a destination. Difficult walking conditions, including poor sidewalks, lack of crosswalks and signals, and other similar factors, decrease that threshold distance. In short, people won't walk as far when the walking conditions are bad.
- Residents in a pedestrian friendly community walked, bicycled, or rode transit for 49% of work trips and 15% of their non-work trips, 18- and 11-percentage points more than residents of a comparable automobile oriented community (Cervero and Radisch, 1995).
- Another study found that walking is three times more common in a community with pedestrian friendly streets than in otherwise comparable communities that are less conducive to foot travel (Moudon, et al, 1996).
Sources:
- Hopkinson, P. and M. Wardman, Evaluating the Demand for New Bicycle Facilities. Transport Policy, 1996. 3(4): p. 241-249. Source URL
- Dill, J. and T. Carr, Bicycle Commuting and Facilities in Major U.S. Cities: If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them. Transportation Research Record, 2003. 1828: p. 116-123. http://www.des.ucdavis.edu/faculty/handy/ESP178/Dill_bike_facilities.pdf
- If You Build Them, Commuters Will Use Them: Association Between Bicycle Facilities And Bicycle Commuting, A.C. Nelson and D. Allen, Transportation Research Record No. 1578, Pedestrian and Bicycle Research 1997. http://pubsindex.trb.org/document/view/default.asp?lbid=578180
- A Longitudinal Analysis Of The Effect Of Bicycle Facilities On Commute Mode Share, Gary Barnes, Kristin Thompson, Kevin Krizek. TRB 85th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers CD-ROM, 2005. http://pubsindex.trb.org/document/view/default.asp?lbid=777415 and online at https://www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/slp/pdf/reports_papers/effect_bike_facilities_mode_share.pdf
- Anne Vernez Moudon, et al (1996), Effects of Site Design on Pedestrian Travel in Mixed Use, Medium-Density Environments, Washington State Transportation Center, Document WA-RD 432.1, (www.wsdot.wa.gov/ppsc/research/onepages/WA-RD4321.htm).
- Peter Loukopoulos and Tommy Gärling (2005), Are Car Users too Lazy to Walk? The Relation of Distance Thresholds for Driving to the Perceived Effort of Walking, TRB 84th Annual Meeting http://pubsindex.trb.org/document/view/default.asp?record=777894
- Robert Cervero and Carolyn Radisch (1995), Travel Choices in Pedestrian Versus Automobile Oriented Neighborhoods, UC Transportation Center, UCTC 281 (http://www.uctc.net/papers/281.pdf).
Tags:
- Cycling Tips and Stories
- 2003
- 2005
- 2013
- 501c3
- automobiles
- bicycle
- bicycle commuting
- bicycle facilities
- bicycle lanes
- bicycle routes
- bicycles
- bicycling
- Bike
- cities
- community
- commuting
- conditions
- cycling
- document
- grant
- guidelines
- meeting
- missouri
- missouri bicycle federation
- neighborhoods
- pedestrian
- points
- policy
- report
- research
- routes
- safety
- sidewalks
- story
- streets
- study
- transit
- transportation
- walking
- Washington
- Bicycle
- Bicycle commuting
- Cycling
- Segregated cycle facilities
- Sustainable transport
- Transport
- Transportation demand management
- Transportation planning
- Walking
« Previous story: Being in a walkable neighborhood adds value to homes
» Next story: Bike Snob comes to MO
Join MoBikeFed's Advocacy Network
MoBikeFed is a statewide group of people like you, working together for better bicycling, walking, and trails in Missouri. When you join our advocacy network you receive occasional important advocacy alerts and bicycle, pedestrian, and trails news from around Missouri.
Working together we make a real difference! Join our advocacy network:
Working together we make a real difference! Join our advocacy network:
Related pages
Current topics...
Archives...
Want better bicycling and walking in Missouri?
We rely on the support of members like you. Please join, renew, or donate today.
- Home
- JOIN/DONATE
- News/Info
- Missouri Bicycling, Running, Trails
- Bicycle Skills and Safety
- Missouri Bike/Ped Law
- Clubs and Organizations
- Bike Shops
- Running Shops
- Bicycling, Running, Trails-related Businesses
- Ride, Run, Walk, Hike, Triathlon, and Events Calendars
- Bicycles on Amtrak
- Maps and Routes
- Trails and Trail Maps
- IBikeMO.org
- Planning a Missouri bicycle trip
- Gravel and Bikepacking Maps & Routes
- Bicycle & Touring Routes
- Advocacy
- Campaigns
- Our Legislative Platform
- Complete Streets
- Statewide Rock Island Trail
- Statewide Trail Vision - Quad State Trail
- Bicycle Friendly Missouri
- Walk Friendly Missouri
- Safe Routes to School
- MoDOT funding crisis
- High Priority Bike/Ped Project List
- Anti-harassment laws in cities & statewide
- Updating the basic bicycle law
- Our Vision for MoDOT
- Our Vision for MPOs/RPCs
- Our Vision for Cities & Counties
- Bicycle, pedestrian, trails plans across MO
- Protecting Vulnerable Road Users
- Vision Zero
- Missouri Trail Towns
- Store
- About